The Justinianic Plague Wasn’t as Bad as Many Scholars Think

December 5, 2019 - General
Artist's representation of a scene during the Justinianic plague.

Researchers say that claims of the Justinianic plague as a “mass killer” are wrong. It certainly had some impact, but they assert that plague outbreak, which began in the 6th century, didn’t bring about the end of the weakened Roman Empire or cause the economic turmoil many scholars have declared it did. Cultures didn’t stagnate and societies didn’t fall to pieces due to the Justinianic plague, according to the new study.

How Bad was the Justinianic Plague Really?

Experts believe the Justinianic plague began during the reign of Emperor Justinian, from whom it gained its name, and hit the remnants of the Roman Empire’s population from around 541 to 544 AD. Outbreaks of the plague reoccurred around the Mediterranean and into Europe and the Middle East until about 750, according to ScienceNews.

Source: origins

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *